Cambridge Healthtech Institute’s 10th Annual

Liquid Biopsy for Disease Management

Advances in Liquid Biopsies for Cancer Patients: Advantages and Challenges

August 19 - 20, 2025 ALL TIMES EDT

While tissue biopsies of cancer have been the gold standard for cancer patients, there are a variety of limitations that make the use of liquid biopsies attractive—and in many cases—preferable. Tissue biopsies are highly invasive, which limits their use for serial monitoring if they are available at all. There may be some discordance between the two approaches, but there is growing recognition that liquid biopsies may provide earlier and more representative information. Liquid biopsies still face real challenges in terms of sensitivity, as well as challenges in clinical acceptance. Examination of successes in demonstrating the value of liquid biopsies for monitoring cancer patients for treatment selection, treatment response, disease prognosis, and disease recurrence will be highlighted. Examples targeting different biomarker classes, or combinations, will also be presented, and challenges for increased clinical use will be discussed.

Tuesday, August 19

PLENARY SESSION

11:30 am

Introduction to GINA

Jessica Lynn Roberts, JD, Professor of Law, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Data Science, Emory Law

This session will provide a brief introduction to the federal Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) and its protections.

11:40 am PLENARY PANEL DISCUSSION:

Genetic Discrimination: Impact of Genetic Test Results on Access to Life, Long-Term Care, and Disability Insurance

PANEL MODERATOR:

Laura Geller, National Investigative Producer, CBS

Genetic testing has become progressively more important in predicting disease risk and has facilitated the development of targeted therapies. Passed in 2008, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) prohibits genetic discrimination by health plans and employers. However, this federal law does not apply to life, long-term care, or disability insurers so it is legal to use genetic test results in these coverage or premium decisions.

This panel brings together stakeholders from the patient, genetic counselor, lab, and research communities to explore:

  • How fear of genetic discrimination impacts the uptake of genetic testing
  • Experiences of patients with pathogenic mutations in securing life, long-term care, and disability insurance policies
  • Informed consent and delivering genetic test results to research participants
  • Legislative efforts to ban the use of genetic information in insurance policy coverage and rate decisions
PANELISTS:

Jennifer R. Leib, Founder, Innovation Policy Solutions LLC

John William Musick, Patient Advocate, End the Legacy

Jessica Lynn Roberts, JD, Professor of Law, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Data Science, Emory Law

Lisa Schlager, Vice President, Public Policy, FORCE Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered

12:20 pm PLENARY PANEL DISCUSSION:

From AI to LDTs: Top Lab Advocacy Topics

PANEL MODERATOR:

Joyce Gresko, Partner, Alston & Bird LLP

  • Over the last few years, policy makers' awareness of the role of clinical laboratory testing services as foundational to preventing and predicting disease and core to informed clinical decision making has increased, with many new voices calling for increased focus on prevention
  • Building upon this increasing awareness to affect positive policy change in reimbursement and regulation is critical to laboratories' advancement of patient access to innovative technologies that are positively changing the way care is delivered
  • Reimbursement issues to be covered will include improving coding policy for new and existing codes, bringing rationality to Medicare payment through PAMA reform, and cutting through aggressive payer prior authorization practices and other barriers to care and payment
  • Regulatory issues will delve into the latest for LDTs from the Administration, Courts, and Congress
PANELISTS:

Jonathan R. Genzen, PhD, CMO, ARUP Labs

Lauren R. Silvis, PhD, Senior Vice President, External Affairs, Tempus, Inc.

Rachel Stauffer, Principal, McDermottPlus Consulting LLC

INTERACTIVE DISCUSSIONS

1:05 pmLuncheon Interactive Discussions (IN-PERSON ONLY)

Interactive Discussions are informal, moderated discussions, allowing participants to exchange ideas and experiences and develop future collaborations around a focused topic. Each discussion will be led by a facilitator who keeps the discussion on track and the group engaged. To get the most out of this format, please come prepared to share examples from your work, be a part of a collective, problem-solving session, and participate in active idea sharing. Please visit the Interactive Discussions page on the conference website for a complete listing of topics and descriptions,

TABLE 5:

Guidance and Considerations for Diagnostic Workups following Positive MCED Results

Christos Patriotis, PhD, Program Director, Cancer Biomarkers Research Group, NIH NCI

  • Ways to improve comparability of MCED test performance for better matching to a patient’s individualized cancer risk              
  • Best options for workups when cancer cannot be imaged              
  • The role of single-cancer tests as reflex for positive MCED results​​
TABLE 6:

Funding and Commercialization Resources for Early Cancer Detection

Linda K. Zane, PhD, Program Director, SBIR Development Center, National Cancer Institute

  • NIH-wide SBIR and STTR programs 
  • Funding opportunities for Early Cancer Detection 
  • Application tips and assistance for awardees and applicants​​​​
TABLE 7:

Challenges with Screening Rate Data and Approaches to Improve Novel Early Cancer Screening Test Development

Gary Gustavsen, PhD, Partner & Managing Director, Health Advances

  • Challenges around existing cancer screening rate data sources – inaccuracy, inaccessibility, incompleteness
  • Impact of these challenges on early detection test development 
  • Proposed solutions and opportunities to get involved​​
TABLE 8:

What is the Optimal Number of Cancers for Which an MCED Should be Trained?

Sam Hanash, MD, PhD, Director, Red & Charline McCombs Institute; Evelyn & Sol Rubenstein Distinguished Chair, Cancer Prevention; Professor, Clinical Cancer Prevention-Research, Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

  • Trade-offs between sensitivity and specificity                
  • The pros and cons of broad vs. more narrow initial training                
  • Accounting for patient risk for more targeted screening​

2:25 pmOrganizer's Welcome Remarks

CLINICAL APPLICATION FOR MRD

2:30 pm

Chairperson's Opening Remarks

Nicholas C. Dracopoli, PhD, CSO, DELFI Diagnostics

2:35 pm

Landscape of Growing Evidence-Base for MRD Testing

Sarah Kurley, PhD, Director, Evidence Strategy, Optum Evidence Engine

Broad adoption of MRD testing is still evolving as the evidence base grows across multiple cancer types and intended uses. Insights from clinical trials, published evidence, and medical policies give perspective on utilization and where the space is headed.

3:05 pm

MRD Recognition & Adoption—Going from the Lab to Patient Care

Krupa Paranjpe, PharmD, Oncology-Global Oncology Leader-Stakeholder Engagement, Medical Affairs Strategy & Clinical Innovation

Advances in cancer care include the recognition of the transformational importance of evolving endpoints such as MRD. What will it take to drive a shift toward MRD recognition and adoption? Education and awareness for all stakeholders in the ecosystem, including patients, providers, payers, and regulators is key to addressing Health System barriers in adoption of MRD as an endpoint and ensuring timely access to innovation for cancer patients.

3:35 pm

cfDNA Fragmentation Applications to Monitor Treatment Response and Disease Progression in Patients with Advanced Cancers

Nicholas C. Dracopoli, PhD, CSO, DELFI Diagnostics

Circulating cfDNA assays for monitoring treatment response and disease progression in individuals with cancer typically rely on prior identification of tumor-specific mutations. Here, we describe a tumor-independent and mutation-independent approach (DELFI-TF) using low-coverage whole genome sequencing to determine the cfDNA tumor fraction and validate the method in independent cohorts of patients with colorectal or lung cancer.

4:05 pmRefreshment Break in the Exhibit Hall with Poster Viewing

CLINICAL APPLICATION FOR MRD (CONT.)

4:45 pm

Tumor-Informed MRD Testing and the Road to Clinical Utility

Gina L. Costa, PhD, Vice President, Product Development, Precision Oncology, Exact Sciences Corp.

Analytical sensitivity under the tumor-informed paradigm for MRD detection shows benefits from targeting more variants, with improvement translating to clinical performance. Traditional NGS approaches face a trade-off between breadth of genomic regions interrogated (number of variants targeted) and depth of sequencing (per target). We developed two tumor-informed MRD platforms: WES-informed hybrid capture assay (first generation, targeting hundreds of variants) and WGS-informed MAESTRO assay (second generation, targeting thousands of variants) designed to bridge this breadth-depth trade-off.  Case/control cancer cohorts spanning diagnosis through monitoring demonstrate striking benefit to recurrence lead times and ctDNA detection sensitivities at single-digit (and below) ppm levels.

5:15 pm

From Insight to Impact: Advancing Precision Oncology with Ultrasensitive, Next-Generation MRD 

Jeff Gregg, Vice President, Medical Affairs, Foresight Diagnostics

Minimal residual disease (MRD) testing has traditionally provided early insights into cancer recurrence risk, but without a clear path to guide treatment decisions. This presentation will show how ultrasensitive, next-generation MRD assays such as Foresight’s CLARITY™ are shifting the role of MRD from passive monitoring to active clinical utility. The session will highlight how actionable MRD results can enable escalation or de-escalation of therapy, support earlier intervention when outcomes can still change, and reduce unnecessary procedures and tests, ultimately helping to drive measurable impact in cancer patient outcomes.


5:45 pm PANEL DISCUSSION:

Session Speakers Q&A

PANEL MODERATOR:

Nicholas C. Dracopoli, PhD, CSO, DELFI Diagnostics

PANELISTS:

Gina L. Costa, PhD, Vice President, Product Development, Precision Oncology, Exact Sciences Corp.

Jeff Gregg, Vice President, Medical Affairs, Foresight Diagnostics

Sarah Kurley, PhD, Director, Evidence Strategy, Optum Evidence Engine

Krupa Paranjpe, PharmD, Oncology-Global Oncology Leader-Stakeholder Engagement, Medical Affairs Strategy & Clinical Innovation

6:15 pmClose of Day

Wednesday, August 20

7:15 amRegistration Open

7:30 amInteractive Discussions with Continental Breakfast (IN-PERSON ONLY)

Interactive Discussions are informal, moderated discussions, allowing participants to exchange ideas and experiences and develop future collaborations around a focused topic. Each discussion will be led by a facilitator who keeps the discussion on track and the group engaged. To get the most out of this format, please come prepared to share examples from your work, be a part of a collective, problem-solving session, and participate in active idea sharing. Please visit the Interactive Discussions page on the conference website for a complete listing of topics and descriptions.

TABLE 5:

Funding and Commercialization Resources for Liquid Biopsy Assay Development

Linda K. Zane, PhD, Program Director, SBIR Development Center, National Cancer Institute

  • NIH-wide SBIR and STTR programs 
  • Funding opportunities for Liquid Biopsy for Cancer Development  
  • Application tips and assistance for awardees and applicants​​
TABLE 6:

Benefits of Working with NIH’s All of Us Program for Liquid Biopsy Development

Sheri Schully, PhD, Deputy Chief Medical and Scientific Officer, All of Us Research Program, NIH

  • Leveraging the All of Us dataset for developing and validating next-generation diagnostics for diverse populations
  • Exploring how our diverse dataset (particularly lifestyle, environment, and geographical distribution) can aid development and implementation of liquid biopsies for cancer
  • How can the dataset be a critical resource for validating novel liquid biopsy assays

IMPROVING LIQUID BIOPSIES

8:25 am

Chairperson's Remarks

Lokesh Agrawal, PhD, Chief (Acting), Biorepositories & Biospecimen Research, NIH NCI

8:30 am

Standardizing ctDNA Assays: The Role of Clinical Guidelines in Driving Adoption

Panieh Terraf, PhD, FACMG, Assistant Professor, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

As circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based assays transition from research settings to broader clinical application, studies have revealed significant variability in validation practices across institutions. This session will explore how clinical validation guidelines are addressing these inconsistencies by offering a standardized framework to support more widespread and uniform adoption. It will also examine persistent barriers and practical challenges as testing expands beyond specialized centers. Emphasis will be placed on the pivotal role of evidence-based standards in supporting clinical implementation, while fostering both innovation and confidence in ctDNA-based liquid biopsy applications.

9:00 am KEYNOTE PRESENTATION:

Reimbursement Issues for Liquid Biopsies for Cancer

Gabriel Bien-Willner, MD, PhD, Medical Director, MolDx, Palmetto GBA

The differences between how CMS and Private Pays approach policy will be reviewed. A description of how MACs work, and how policies are considered with be provided. The presentation will also focus on existing liquid biopsy policy and coding strategies.


9:30 am

Role of Biospecimen Science and Biobanking in Understanding Liquid Biopsies in Cancer

Lokesh Agrawal, PhD, Chief (Acting), Biorepositories & Biospecimen Research, NIH NCI

Biospecimens are the essential starting materials for the biomarker assays that enable precision medicine and preanalytical factors can directly influence molecular results from assays conducted for basic research, biomarker discovery, and biomarker validation, and can also influence the development of clinical assays. The presentation will focus on the role of biospecimen science in context of cfDNA as a predictive, prognostic clinical biomarker, MRD assays, and The Cancer Moonshot Biobank (moonshotbiobank.cancer.gov), which is a NCI-sponsored study that aims to accelerate cancer research through the collection of longitudinal liquid biopsy specimens and tissues from patients with advanced cancer receiving standard of care therapy.

10:00 amNetworking Coffee Break

IMPROVING LIQUID BIOPSIES (CONT.)

10:30 am

Towards the Standardization of DNA Methylation Cancer Biomarker Measurements

Hua-Jun He, PhD, Research Biologist, NIST

Aberrant DNA methylation is a promising biomarker for early cancer, multicancer, and types of cancer detection. However, there is currently a lack of reliable and quantifiable methods for DNA methylation analysis. In collaboration with our stakeholders, including NCI/EDRN, we have developed both genomic and cell-free format-based reference materials (RMs) for DNA methylation measurements. I will discuss the development, characterization, and utility of these RMs through pilot interlaboratory studies, as well as the improved control assay panel, aimed at standardizing DNA methylation measurements.

11:00 am

Leveraging All of Us Research Program Resources for Early Cancer Detection: Biomarker Discovery and Liquid Biopsy Development

Sheri Schully, PhD, Deputy Chief Medical and Scientific Officer, All of Us Research Program, NIH

This session will explore how researchers can utilize the All of Us Research Program's participant cohort and comprehensive biospecimen repository to identify novel liquid biomarkers for early cancer detection, including circulating tumor DNA, proteins, and metabolites. Participants will learn strategies for integrating multi-omics data with electronic health records and social determinants of health to enhance biomarker discovery while ensuring equitable representation across populations.

11:30 am PANEL DISCUSSION:

Session Speakers Q&A

PANEL MODERATOR:

Lokesh Agrawal, PhD, Chief (Acting), Biorepositories & Biospecimen Research, NIH NCI

PANELISTS:

Gabriel Bien-Willner, MD, PhD, Medical Director, MolDx, Palmetto GBA

Hua-Jun He, PhD, Research Biologist, NIST

Sheri Schully, PhD, Deputy Chief Medical and Scientific Officer, All of Us Research Program, NIH

Panieh Terraf, PhD, FACMG, Assistant Professor, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

12:00 pmEnjoy Lunch on Your Own

CLINICAL APPLICATION OF LIQUID BIOPSIES FOR TREATMENT AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT

1:10 pm

Chairperson's Remarks

Chris Karlovich, PhD, Director, Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research

1:15 pm

Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of ctDNA in Patients Screened for the NCI-MATCH Trial

Chris Karlovich, PhD, Director, Molecular Characterization Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research

Our experience testing ctDNA from the plasma of ~2300 patients with rare or uncommon cancers screened for the NCI-MATCH trial, the largest precision medicine initiative ever conducted, will be presented. We used a 523-gene targeted panel to identify tumor and CHIP-derived somatic alterations in blood and evaluated blood TMB and MSI status. CtDNA molecular profiles were also compared to targeted NGS data from matched tumor biopsies.

1:45 pm

Liquid Biopsy beyond Genotyping

Justin Odegaard, MD, PhD, Vice President, Product Management, Guardant Health

Liquid biopsy helped democratize genomically-targeted precision oncology; however, this is only the beginning of the impact for liquid biopsy in the treatment of cancer. In this session, we will explore how Infinity, a single combined genomic-epigenomic liquid biopsy technology, unlocks molecular phenotyping as the next evolution in therapy selection, molecular disease monitoring for more precise management of early and late-stage patients alike, and patient-centric early cancer detection.

2:15 pm

Use of ctDNA as an Early Indicator of Response to Therapy

Jeff Allen, PhD, President and CEO, Friends of Cancer Research

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) holds promise as a drug development tool to measure treatment efficacy in clinical trials. The ctMoniTR Project is a multi-stakeholder partnership used to develop the necessary data to support the use of ctDNA as a molecular response measure. Initial analyses across numerous clinical trials will evaluate the extent to which ctDNA change correlates with treatment outcomes. Validating the use of ctDNA as an early endpoint will accelerate research by enabling rapid identification of effective new cancer therapies and ultimately allow them to reach patients sooner.

2:45 pm

Emergence of Cell Biopsies: Disruptive Forces are Reshaping the Field of Liquid Biopsies for Solid Tumors

Arshad Ahmed, MBA, Vice President, Business Development, 1Cell.Ai

Liquid biopsy is a highly attractive market and is largely composed of players that provide the ability to capture and analyze circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). The new battle however, is going to be fought on the ability to detect cancer proteins, RNA as well DNA from blood; i.e., the emergence of multiomics in liquid biopsies.  A fundamental shift in pharma pipeline to protein-directed therapies is causing this change. My presentation will discuss this shift as well as the emergence of Cell Biopsies and Exosomes that will drive this next-generation of liquid biopsies.

3:15 pmClose of Summit





No Agenda API URL configured.